 |
| MORAL CLARITY |
AL-ASSAD IS BAD
HILLARY CLINTON WILL RESET SYRIA POLICY AGAINST 'MURDEROUS' ASSAD REGIME
Hillary Clinton will order a "full review" of the United States' strategy on Syria as a "first key task" of her presidency, resetting the policy to emphasise the "murderous" nature of the Assad regime, foreign policy adviser with her campaign has said.
"It is a murderous regime that violates human rights; that has violated international law; used chemical weapons against his own people; has killed hundreds of thousands of people, including tens of thousands of children."
The White House remains notionally committed to removing Mr Assad
whilst at the same time, working in alliance with Russia, Damascus' top champion.
Critics warn that this approach will only foster anti-American sentiment among Syrians, who feel abandoned by the United States
following its failure to take decisive action against Damascus.
MORAL CLARITY
Clinton administration would seek to bring "moral clarity" to the US strategy on the Syrian crises.
"a Syria policy review will be one of the first items of business for the national security team,"
The Clinton campaign strategy as listed on its website revives
plan to create "safe zones" on the ground for civilians.
This would require a de facto no fly zone to prevent air strikes in the area.
It is a strategy that has been passionately opposed by Damascus, which sees this is a safe haven for rebel opposition groups.
"This creates leverage and momentum for a diplomatic solution that removes Assad and brings Syria’s communities together to fight ISIS,"
a foreign policy more hawkish than that of the current administration.
how Mrs Clinton will behave as commander-in-chief from her time as secretary of state.
During that time
she championed the intervention in Libya
and advocated the arming of Syrian rebels against the regime.
"She sees the importance of American leadership as a first principle,"
"Mrs Clinton believes that problems around the world can more easily be solved when America is involved and in each of those problems or crisis.
We always try to work with coalitions of people and countries and leaders who are willing to tackle the problems in the same way we are."
Mrs Clinton, who supported the 2003 invasion of Iraq,
would not feel "constrained" as many in the Obama administration have been in the wake of its disastrous legacy.
*
Syrian troops fire on protesters at Damascus funeral
Eyewitness dispatch:
Syrian security forces opened fire on 15,000 people in a funeral procession that became one of the largest Damascus protests since the uprising against President Bashar Assad began.
*
Syria anniversary: the psychopaths are unstoppable
Three years after it began, the civil war has become a nightmare of barbarity and carnage, reports Richard Spencer in an impassioned dispatch from the province of Aleppo
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10695217/Syria-anniversary-the-psychopaths-are-unstoppable.html
*
“THE ART OF WAR”
Clinton’s explosive e-mails
Manlio Dinucci
Western media and political establishment to do a bit of “political cleansing”.
Thus the West pulls out some skeleton from the closet.
A British Parliamentary Committee has criticized David Cameron for authorizing the use of force in Libya when he was Prime Minister in 2011. However the basis for criticism was not the war of aggression per se (even though it erased from the map a sovereign state) but rather the fact that war was entered into without an adequate “intelligence” foundation and also because there was no plan for “reconstruction” .
The same mistake was made by President Obama: thus he declared last April that Libya was his “biggest regret”, not because he used US-led Nato forces to reduce it to smithereens but because he had failed to plan for “the day after”.
Hillary Clinton Secretary of State, convinced Obama to authorize a covert operation in Libya
(which included sending in special forces and arming terrorist groups) in preparation for a US/Nato aeronaval attack.
Clinton’s e mails that subsequently came to light, prove what the real motive for war might be:
blocking Gaddafi’s plan to harness Libya’s sovereign funds to establish independent financial organizations, located within the African Union and an African currency that could serve as an alternative to the dollar and the CFA franc.
Immediately after razing the State of Libya, the US and Nato brought in the Gulf Monarchies and set about a covert operation to destroy the State of Syria by infiltrating it with special forces and terrorist groups that gave birth to Isis.
An e mail from Clinton, one of the many the Department of State was compelled to de-classify following the uproar triggered by the disclosures on Wikileaks, proves what one of the key objectives of the operation still underway.
In an e mail dated 31 December 2012, declassified as “case no: F – 2014 – 20439, Doc No. CO5794998”, Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, wrote [2]:
“It is Iran’s strategic relationship with the Bashar Assad regime that allows Iran to threaten Israel’s security – not through a direct attack but through its allies in Lebanon such as the Hezbollah.”
“the best way to help Israel is to help the rebellion in Syria that has now lasted for more than a year” (i.e. from 2011).
How? By mounting the case that the use of force is a sina qua non to make Basshar Assad fold,
so as to endanger his life and that of his family”.
“wrecking Assad would not only be a huge advantage for the security of the State of Israel, but would also go a long way to reducing Israel’s justifiable fear that it will lose its nuclear monopoly”.
So, the former Secretary of State admits what officially is not said. That Israel is the only country in the Middle East to possess nuclear weapons .
The support given by the Obama Administration to Israel over and above some disagreements (more formal than substantive) is confirmed by the agreement signed on 14 September at Washington under which the United States agrees
to supply Israel over a ten year period with weapons of the latest design for a value of 38 billion dollars through an annual financing of 3.3 billion dollars plus half a million for “missile defense”.
*
House of Commons
Foreign Affairs Committee
Libya: Examination of intervention and collapse and the UK’s future policy options
*
HILLARY CLINTON EMAIL ARCHIVE
NEW IRAN AND SYRIA 2.DOC
UNCLASSIFIED U.S. Department of State Case No. F-2014-20439 Doc No. C05794498 Date: 11/30/2015
Douteur je doute. On ne doute jamais assez. Tout ce qu'on vous dit est faux. Tout ce que vous savez est faux. Parce que tout ce qu'on vous dit est faux. Mais il se peut qu'une partie de ce que savez soit vraie mais laquelle? Le professeur Bulle a parlé. Ou pensé quelque chose. Ou eut une émotion quelconque. Le professeur Bulle pense quelques fois par année donc il lui arrive d'être. Mais pas souvent!
*
Doubting I doubt. One doubt never enough. Everything you said is wrong. Everything you know is wrong. Because everything they said to you is false. But it may be only a part of what you know who is true or false but which? Professor bubble spoke. Or thought something. Or had an emotion any. Professor bubble think a few times a year, so he happens to be. But not often!
