6167

ARE WE ON THE BRINK OF WORLD WAR III?


Justin Raimondo

June 2, 2013

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2013/06/02/are-we-on-the-brink-of-world-war-iii/

http://original.antiwar.com/justin/2013/06/02/are-we-on-the-brink-of-world-war-iii/print/

Several commentators have pointed to the similarities between the pre-World War I era and our own.

While every historical analogy is, by definition, inexact, they are right to raise the alarm.

IN 1914, EUROPE WAS DIVIDED INTO TWO CAMPS:

the Entente, consisting of Britain, France, and Russia,

and the Central Powers, predominantly Germany and the Austro-Hungarian Empire

(Italy was formally a member, but went neutral when the war started, eventually joining the Entente).

WHILE THIS DIVISION HAD ITS ROOTS IN THE LONG HISTORY OF INTER-IMPERIALIST RIVALRY OVER THE ACQUISITION OF COLONIES IN AFRICA AND THE FAR EAST –

[En fait, les bases du conflit se trouvait dans la préséance lors du pillage du monde. Les premiers arrivés ne voulant pas voir arriver d’autres nécessiteux de peur de devoir partager écuelle et mangoire.]

WITH THE “HAVES” BEING BRITAIN AND FRANCE,

AND THE “HAVE NOTS” BEING GERMANY AND AUSTRIA –

by the turn of the century the conflict began to re-focus on the European theater,

where the breakup of the Ottoman Empire in Southeastern Europe

– THE BALKANS –

put the rival camps on a collision course.

Intent on penetrating the region and promoting its pan-Slavic agenda,

Russia was fanning the flames of Serbian nationalism in the region,

and the Kingdom of Serbia was the logical launching pad for this campaign.

Serbia was a cauldron of ultra-nationalist sentiment,

where – at the instigation of Russian agents – secret societies sprang up militantly agitating for a “Greater Serbia.”

A pseudo-mystical ultra-nationalist narrative was elaborated for popular consumption, based on the idea of restoring the old “Greater Serbia” of the pre-Ottoman era, a supposedly glorious chapter in the history of the race that ended with the defeat of Prince Lazar on the famous Field of Blackbirds: Lazar died heroically, fighting off Turkish Janissaries.

The great problem of the Serbian nationalists, however, was – and is – their expansive concept of what “Greater Serbia” consists of: every spot on which a Serbian Orthodox church or monastery ever existed is, today, considered Serbian territory by these radicals,

and back in 1914 they were far more numerous – and powerful – than they are at the present moment.

Indeed, as Ralph Raico points out:

“The immediate origins of the 1914 war lie in the twisted politics of the Kingdom of Serbia.[1]

In June, 1903, Serbian army officers murdered their king and queen in the palace and threw their bodies out a window, at the same time massacring various royal relations, cabinet ministers, and members of the palace guards.

It was an act that horrified and disgusted many in the civilized world.

The military clique replaced the pro-Austrian Obrenovic dynasty with the anti-Austrian Karageorgevics.

The new government pursued a pro-Russian, Pan-Slavist policy, and a network of secret societies sprang up, closely linked to the government, whose goal was the ‘liberation’ of the Serb subjects of Austria (and Turkey), and perhaps the other South Slavs as well.”

The foreign policy of the Serbian government, with ultra-nationalist Prime Minister Nicolas Pasic at its head, “aimed at the creation of a Greater Serbia,”

writes Raico,

“necessarily at the expense of Austria-Hungary.”

THE RUSSIANS, THE BRITISH, AND THE FRENCH ALL BACKED THE SERBS’ EXPANSIONIST CLAIMS,

and, WITH RUSSIAN HELP,

a series of Balkan wars saw the doubling in size of the Serbian kingdom as the decibel level of Serbian revanchist agitation picked up.

IT WAS IN THIS VOLATILE CONTEXT THAT A BOSNIAN SERB FANATIC, ONE GAVRILO PRINCIP, SHOT AND KILLED ARCHDUKE FRANCIS FERDINAND, heir to the Austro-Hungarian throne, in Sarajevo.

Princip and his collaborators were members of the “Black Hand,” an extreme nationalist group

HEADED UP BY THE CHIEF OF SERBIAN INTELLIGENCE.

THE AUSTRIAN ANNEXATION OF BOSNIA HAD ADDED FUEL TO THE FIRE,

and set off a series of assassination attempts on Austrian officials by the “Black Hand.”

When the Archduke visited Sarajevo,

Austrian troops were massing on the Bosnian-Serbian border, backing up an Austrian demand that the Serbs renounce all claims to the territory.

The Serbs complied, but the actions of Princip and his co-conspirators

SET OFF AN EXPLOSION THAT ENDED WITH THE DESTRUCTION OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION.

[Et l’arrivée sur la scène d’un nouveau joueur : un pays agricole, les USA.]

WHAT TURNED A REGIONAL CONFLICT OVER NARROWLY DEFINED ISSUES OF CHIEFLY LOCAL INTEREST

INTO A GLOBAL CONFLAGRATION

WAS THE SYSTEM OF ALLIANCES AND RESULTING INTRIGUES THAT PLAGUED WORLD POLITICS.

I won’t go into the longstanding controversy over who bears the chief burden of “war guilt”:

suffice to say here that

THE STRUCTURAL LOGIC OF THE TWO RIVAL ALLIANCES

HAD AN ESCALATING EFFECT, ONE THAT DRAGGED THE REST OF EUROPE – AND US –

INTO THE VORTEX OF DESTRUCTION.

[Précisons pour les humanistes amateurs de libre arbitre, d’individu, de personnalité : une guerre ne se fait pas par ceux qui l’ont préparée ou décidée. Quelques vieillards rhumatismeux aussi psychopathes soient-ils. Cette guerre ne durerait pas longtemps. Il faut des peuples. Des millions d’individus. Qui, comme un seul homme, se prononcent présent. Et vont au casse-pipe. La docilité des lemmings martyres est indispensable.]

FROM THE TRENCHES OF THE GREAT WAR SPRANG THE WORST MONSTERS OF THE TWENTIETH CENTURY:

FASCISM, NATIONAL SOCIALISM, AND BOLSHEVISM

[Et le capitalisme US]

THE DEATH TOLL WAS IN THE MILLIONS.

In its broad outlines, we face a similar situation today.

THE BALKANS OF THE NEW MILLENNIUM IS UNDOUBTEDLY THE MIDDLE EAST,

and here it is that, ONCE AGAIN,

A COUNTRY IMBUED WITH A RELIGIOUSLY-INSPIRED VISION OF A “GREATER” VERSION OF ITSELF IS PUSHING AN EXPANSIONIST POLICY,

having roughly doubled its size since its inception as an independent nation.

Inspired by an ideological vision that seeks to recreate a glorious past kingdom,

[Un passé imaginaire. Et les supposés «juifs» actuels qui règnent en Israël après avoir envahi et supplanté la population locale, n’ont probablement pas une goutte de sang hébreux. Ce sont des juifs européens, descendants de tribus converties. Dirigés par des sorciers fanatiques.]

and driven by the religious fanaticism of a militant ultra-nationalist movement,

THE STATE OF ISRAEL IS THE SERBIA OF OUR TIME –

the epicenter and catalyst of the coming conflict.

Of course, the specifics are quite different:

yet the broad outlines of the Balkan scenario fit the Middle East to a tee.

WE HAVE THE MODERN DAY ENTENTE – THE “HAVES,” I.E. THE WESTERN POWERS OF THE US, BRITAIN, AND FRANCE,

[La Communauté Européenne – avec les Européens qui «comptent». Ou la Communauté Internationale imaginaire des médias. Les mêmes. Plus les USA.]

VERSUS THE “HAVE NOTS,”

those being RUSSIA, IRAN, AND SYRIA.

Standing warily on the sidelines is China, a formerly “have not” nation on its way to becoming a superpower, which is increasingly tilting toward the latter.

AND OF COURSE THE WESTERN ALLIES HAVE THEIR MIDDLE EASTERN PROTECTORATES, OR WHAT’S LEFT OF THEM, IN JORDAN, TURKEY, SAUDI ARABIA, AND THE GULF STATES.

Under normal conditions, the narrowly defined issues of whether the Ba’athists should continue to rule Syria,

or the status of the occupied territories of Palestine,

would be of chiefly local interest.

UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF INTER-IMPERIALIST RIVALRY, HOWEVER, EVERY LOCAL ETHNIC-RELIGIOUS-TERRITORIAL DISPUTE HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BECOME AN ISSUE OF GLOBAL IMPORT.

That’s what gave Gavrilo Princip the opportunity to fire the first shot of the Great War and achieve a malign immortality.

[Faut pas lui donner autant d’importance. Il a mis le feu aux poudres. Mais la poudre était là attendant l’explosion et la flamme. Si ce n’avait été lui, c’aurait été son frère ou son cousin. Les grands États attendant de s’égorger à coups de millions de pauvres crétins.]

It’s not hard to imagine a similarly explosive incident somewhere in the Middle East

signaling the FIRST VOLLEYS OF WORLD WAR III.

The region is so crowded with tripwires

that IT’S ONLY A MATTER OF TIME BEFORE UNCLE SAM STUMBLES OVER ONE

and is driven by the structural logic of its alliances into a war with Iran:

indeed, THE FIRST SHOTS OF THAT WAR HAVE ALREADY BEEN FIRED,

IN SYRIA,

where the World War I analogy seamlessly segues into a parallel with World War II.

THE END OF THE COLD WAR DID NOT LEAD TO A “UNIPOLAR WORLD,”

as Charles Krauthammer and his fellow neocons celebrated it in the early 1990s.

Instead of the “BENEVOLENT GLOBAL HEGEMONY”

[Des USA !!!!!]

envisioned by Bill Kristol and Robert Kagan in their nineties foreign policy manifesto,

WE ARE BACK TO THE PRE-WWI ERA OF OLD-FASHIONED INTER-IMPERIALIST RIVALRY.

Instead of the “end of history,”

WE STAND AT THE BEGINNING OF A NEW ERA OF NATIONALISM, RELIGIOUS FANATICISM, AND IDEOLOGICALLY-DRIVEN VIOLENCE.

Combined with the structural incentives for conflict inherent in our system of alliances

and the built-in dangers of a policy of “collective security,”

THIS IS A RECIPE FOR ANOTHER WORLD WAR.

[Si les millions de pauvres idiots refusent de la faire, bingo!, il n’y a pas de guerre. S’ils la font, tant pis pour eux.]

In reading various accounts of the origins of World War I,

I AM STRUCK BY THE LEITMOTIF OF UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES

that runs throughout that tragic story:

IT IS A NARRATIVE OF EVENTS THAT TOOK ON A LIFE OF THEIR OWN,

and created such a momentum for war

that all the combatants were dragged along the road to destruction in spite of themselves.

[Faux. Ce sont les gouvernements des États qui ont décidé cette guerre. Aucun n’étant capable de voir plus loin que le bout de son jet de pisse. Les combattants ayant aussi peu d’importance que les cerveaux des fourmis victimes de la Douve du foie. On les a rameutés. L’instinct tribal a fait le reste. Une fois commencée, comme toutes les autres guerres, celle-là ne se terminerait que lorsque la balance de la mort pencherait davantage d’un côté que de l’autre. L’assassinat de masse ne se conclut qu’au bout de tonnes de chair humaine liquéfiée.]

AS THE RUSSIANS SEND MISSILES TO SYRIA,

[Et protège les 9 (?) centrales nucléaires Iranienne d’un sort similaire à l’Osirak Irakien (boum boum des Israéliens). C’est la seule explication que personne ne commente qui empêche les pousse au crime Israéliens de faire un Liban/Gaza du pays.]

AND THE US (AND ITS GULF ALLIES) SUPPORT AND ARM THE ISLAMIST REBELS,

the involvement of Iran is bound to drag in the United States sooner or later.

Meanwhile, OUR MODERN DAY SERBIANS,

THE ISRAELIS,

ARE BUSY SWALLOWING UP EVER-GREATER PORTIONS OF THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES OF PALESTINE,

and conducting bombing raids on Syrian territory.

In short, the Middle East is a tinderbox, even more explosive than the Balkans of 1914 –

AND 2014 MAY MARK THE BEGINNING OF YET ANOTHER HUNDRED-YEAR CYCLE OF GLOBAL CONFLICT.

[Pas sûr, les USA seront détruit. Israël aussi. Nommez les autres victimes selon votre goût. Comme après une transfusion de sang, les sujets de l’expérience de vivisection seront ensuite plus calme.]

But it doesn’t have to turn out that way.

We have a choice.

[Non. La population n’a aucun choix. Elle compose les munitions des malades mentaux qui dirigent ce monde. Et sera agi par eux le moment venu. Les quelques contradicteurs seront pourchassés par les zombies bureaucrates et dénoncés par leurs voisins comme traîtres et anti-patriotes.]

Indeed, we are each of us making the choice right now,

BY WHAT WE CHOOSE TO BELIEVE,

AND WHAT WE CHOOSE TO SUPPORT.

For there is the UNMISTAKABLE SOUND OF WAR DRUMS IN THE AIR,

and it is COMING FROM WASHINGTON, D.C.,

which daily threatens Iran

and where Congress has just passed a bill authorizing aid to the Syrian rebels.

AN AMENDMENT SPECIFYING THIS IS NOT A BLANK CHECK FOR THE PRESIDENT TO GO TO WAR OVER SYRIA FAILED.

Lines are being drawn:

sides are being taken –

and, AS USUAL, THE WRONG SIDE IS EMPOWERED BY THE LOUDEST VOICES.

[Les fous dirigent ce monde. Des fous énergiques et sans cervelle. Et ces fous ne dorment jamais. ]

(…)

HAVING FAILED TO LEARN THE LESSON OF HISTORY –

even relatively recent history –

OUR POLITICIANS ARE REPEATING THE MISTAKES OF 1914.

[Et les erreurs de 1939. Et celle de la guerre de Corée, du Vietnam, etc.]

Disdaining the sage advice of the Founders,

WE ARE ONCE AGAIN GOING ABROAD IN SEARCH OF MONSTERS TO DESTROY:

impelled by our system of entangling alliances,

WE ARE DRAWN INELUCTABLY INTO THE VORTEX OF DESTRUCTION.

(…)

THE REAL QUESTION IS – WILL WE SURVIVE AT ALL?

That’s what it comes down to. As the world teeters on the brink of a global war, Antiwar.com teeters on the edge of extinction.

Only you – our readers and supporters – can stop that from happening.

It’s as simple as that.

66 Comments

*

And the War Came

Ralph Raico

September 21, 2012

https://mises.org/daily/6184/And-the-War-Came#note1