*
THE 11TH ANNIVERSARY OF 9/11
Paul Craig Roberts
September 11, 2012
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2012/09/11/the-11th-anniversary-911-paul-craig-roberts/
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-11th-anniversary-of-911/5304057
The article below was written for the Journal of 9/11 Studies for the eleventh anniversary of September 11, 2001,
THE DAY THAT TERMINATED ACCOUNTABLE GOVERNMENT AND AMERICAN LIBERTY.
(…)
In order to understand the improbability of the government’s explanation of 9/11,
it is not necessary to know anything about what force or forces brought down the three World Trade Center buildings,
WHAT HIT THE PENTAGON
or caused the explosion,
the flying skills or lack thereof of the alleged hijackers,
WHETHER THE AIRLINER CRASHED IN PENNSYLVANIA OR WAS SHOT DOWN,
whether cell phone calls made at the altitudes could be received,
or any other debated aspect of the controversy.
YOU ONLY HAVE TO KNOW TWO THINGS.
One is that according to the official story, a handful of Arabs, mainly Saudi Arabians, operating independently of any government and competent intelligence service, men without James Bond and V for Vendetta capabilities, outwitted not only the CIA,
FBI, and National Security Agency, but all 16 US intelligence agencies,
along with all security agencies of America’s NATO allies
and Israel’s Mossad.
?
Not only did the entire intelligence forces of the Western world fail,
but on the morning of the attack the entire apparatus of the National Security State simultaneously failed.
Airport security failed four times in one hour.
NORAD failed.
Air Traffic Control failed.
The US Air Force failed.
The National Security Council failed.
Dick Cheney failed.
Absolutely nothing worked.
THE WORLD’S ONLY SUPERPOWER WAS HELPLESS AT THE HUMILIATING MERCY OF A FEW UNDISTINGUISHED ARABS.
It is hard to image a more far-fetched story–except for the second thing you need to know:
The humiliating failure of US National Security
did not result in immediate demands from the President of the United States, from Congress, from the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
AND FROM THE MEDIA
for an investigation of how such improbable total failure could have occurred.
NO ONE WAS HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THE GREATEST FAILURE OF NATIONAL SECURTITY IN WORLD HISTORY
[Il y aurait dans l'Histoire, les oies sacrées du Capitole. Rome avait été envahi par les Gaulois. Les soldats se terrent au Capitole pendant que les envahisseurs massacrent la population. La nuit suivante, ils cherchent à escalader les murailles de la dernière citadelle mais les oies sacrées qu'ils n'avaient pas encore mangées malgré la famine les avertirent en criant. - Les oies sont comme ça. Impossible de leur faire peur, elles courent partout en faisant du bruit. Et impossible de les rattraper. C'est ainsi que de nos jours, on s'en sert pour garder certains aéroports militaires la nuit. - Tandis que les chiens continuaient à dormir. Pour commémorer cet événement, Rome gardera des oies à cet endroit et on organisera une parade annuelle où une oie était promenée sur un bouclier décoré accompagné d'un chien accroché à une fourche. Et tout le long du trajet, on crucifiera vivant des chiens pour les punir de leur paresse.]
Instead, the White House dragged its feet for a year resisting any investigation
until the persistent demands from 9/11 families for accountability
forced President George W. Bush to appoint a political commission,
devoid of any experts,
to hold a pretend investigation.
ON 9/11 DOUBTS WERE IMMEDIATE
On September 11, 2001, a neighbor telephoned and said, “turn on the TV.” I assumed that a hurricane, possibly a bad one from the sound of the neighbor’s voice, was headed our way, and turned on the TV to determine whether we needed to shutter the house and leave.
What I saw was black smoke from upper floors of one of the World Trade Center towers.
It didn’t seem to be much of a fire,
and the reports were that the fire was under control.
While I was trying to figure out why every TV network had its main news anchor covering an office fire, TV cameras showed
an airplane hitting the other tower.
IT WAS THEN THAT I LEARNED THAT BOTH TOWERS HAD BEEN HIT BY AIRLINERS.
Cameras showed people standing at the hole in the side of the tower looking out.
This didn’t surprise me.
The airliner was minute compared to the massive building.
But what was going on?
TWO ACCIDENTS, ONE ON TOP OF THE OTHER?
The towers—the three-fourths or four-fifths of the buildings beneath the plane strikes–were standing,
APPARENTLY LARGELY UNDAMAGED.
There were no signs of fire except in the vicinity of where the airliners had hit.
Suddenly, one of the towers blew up,
DISINTEGRATED,
and DISAPPEARED IN FINE DUST.
Before one could make any sense of this,
THE SAME THING HAPPENED TO THE SECOND TOWER,
and it too disappeared into fine dust.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6alf9_xswA
THE TV NEWS ANCHORS COMPARED THE DISINTEGRATION OF THE TOWERS TO CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
THERE WERE NUMEROUS REPORTS OF EXPLOSIONS THROUGHOUT THE TOWERS FROM THE BASE OR SUB-BASEMENTS TO THE TOP.
Once the government put out the story of terrorist attack, references to controlled demolition and explosions disappeared from the print and TV media.
This made sense to me.
SOMEONE HAD BLOWN UP THE BUILDINGS.
It was completely OBVIOUS THAT THE TOWERS HAD NOT FALLEN DOWN FROM ASYMMETRICAL STRUCTURAL DAMAGE.
They had blown up.
THE IMAGES OF THE AIRLINERS HITTING THE TOWERS AND THE TOWERS BLOWING UP WERE REPLAYED TIME AND AGAIN.
[Jusqu’à ce que les télespectateurs d’ici appellant en nombre pour supplier les postes de TV de cesser de les montrer. Ce qui était une bonne indication du moral de la population et de la manière dont, dans le futur, elle se comportera face à l’affaire : S.V.P. Ne nous montrez rien. On SAIT ce qui s’est passé. VOUS nous l’avez assez dit.]
AIRLINERS HIT THE TOP PORTIONS OF THE TOWERS, AND NOT LONG AFTERWARD THE TOWERS BLEW UP.
I TURNED OFF THE TV WONDERING HOW IT WAS THAT CAMERAS HAD BEEN READY TO CATCH SUCH AN UNUSUAL PHENOMENON as an airplane flying into a skyscraper.
[La version officielle étant que des journalistes étrangers, tout à fait par hasard, étaient là pour filmer la scène. Malheureusement, aucun d'entre eux n'étaient présents pour faire la même chose au Pentagone.]
I don’t remember the time line, but it wasn’t long before the story was in place that
OSAMA BIN LADEN AND HIS AL QAEDA GANG HAD ATTACKED THE US.
[Devenue la version officielle. Toute personne ayant un poste dans le système, du «journaliste» au bureaucrate, même s'il ne travaille pas directement pour un gouvernement, poussera des cris de bêtes blessées face à la négation de cette thèse. Comme autrefois, on aurait gémi devant la négation de Satan. On remarquera que monsieur Ben Laden, si imaginatif, n'a jamais été capable de refaire une telle chose. Ce qui prouve sans doute que les mesures de sécurité supplémentaires si coûteuses auront été efficaces.]
A passport had been found in the rubble.
Another airliner had flown into the Pentagon,
and a fourth airliner had crashed
or been shot down.
4 AIRLINERS HAD BEEN HIJACKED,
meaning airport security had failed four times on the same morning.
Terrorists had successfully assaulted America.
When I heard these reports, I wondered.
HOW COULD A TINY UNDAMAGED PASSPORT BE FOUND IN THE RUBBLE OF TWO SKYSCRAPERS, EACH MORE THAN 100 STORIES TALL, WHEN BODIES, OFFICE FURNITURE AND COMPUTERS COULD NOT BE FOUND?
How could airport security fail so totally that four airliners could be hijacked within the same hour?
HOW COULD AUTHORITIES KNOW so conclusively and almost IMMEDIATELY THE NAMES OF THE PERPETRATORS
WHO PULLED OFF SUCH A SUCCESSFUL ATTACK on the world’s only superpower,
when the authorities had no idea that such an attack was planned
or even possible?
These questions disturbed me,
because as a former member of the congressional staff and as a presidential appointee to high office,
I had high level security clearances.
In addition to my duties as Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury,
I had FEMA responsibilities in the event of nuclear attack.
There was a mountain hideaway to which I was supposed to report in the event of a nuclear attack
AND FROM WHICH I WAS SUPPOSED TO TAKE OVER THE US GOVERNMENT
in the event no higher official survived the attack.
The more the story of 9/11 was presented in the media,
[Et elle fut présentée de manière obsessionnelle et hypnotique.]
the more wondrous it became.
IT IS NOT CREDIBLE THAT NOT ONLY THE CIA AND FBI FAILED TO DETECT THE PLOT,
BUT ALSO ALL 16 US INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES,
including the National Security Agency,
which spies on everyone on the planet,
and the Defense Intelligence Agency,
Israel’s Mossad,
and the intelligence agencies of Washington’s NATO allies.
THERE ARE SIMPLY TOO MANY WATCHMEN
AND TOO MUCH INFILTRATION OF TERRORIST GROUPS
FOR SUCH A COMPLEX ATTACK TO BE PREPARED UNDETECTED
AND CARRIED OUT UNDETERRED.
Washington’s explanation of the attack implied a security failure too massive to be credible. Such a catastrophic failure of national security would mean that the US and Western Europe were never safe for one second during the Cold War,
that the Soviet Union could have destroyed the entire West in one undetected fell swoop.
As a person whose colleagues at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington were former secretaries of state, former national security advisors, former CIA directors, former chairmen of the Joint Chiefs of Staff,
I WAS TROUBLED BY THE STORY THAT A COLLECTION OF INDIVIDUALS UNSUPPORTED BY A COMPETENT INTELLIGENCE SERVICE HAD PULLED OFF THE EVENTS OF 9/11.
As a person with high level government service,
I KNEW THAT ANY SUCH SUCCESSFUL OPERATION AS 9/11
would have resulted in immediate demands from the White House, Congress, and the media for accountability.
There would have been an investigation of how every aspect of US security could totally fail simultaneously in one morning.
Such a catastrophic and embarrassing failure of the national security state would not be left unexamined.
NORAD failed.
The US Air Force could not get jet fighters in the air.
Air Traffic Control lost sight of the hijacked airliners.
YET, INSTEAD OF LAUNCHING AN INVESTIGATION,
the White House resisted for one year the demands of the 9/11 families for an investigation.
NEITHER THE PUBLIC,
THE MEDIA,
NOR CONGRESS
seemed to think an investigation was necessary.
[Car la seule autre possibilité – inenvisageable, intolerable, sidérante était que…]
THE FOCUS WAS ON REVENGE,
which the Bush neocon regime said meant INVADING AFGHANISTAN
which was ALLEGED TO BE SHELTERING THE PERPETRATOR, Osama bin Laden.
Normally, terrorists are proud of their success and announce their responsibility.
It is a way to build a movement.
Often a number of terrorist groups will compete in claiming credit for a successful operation.
But Osama bin Laden in the last video that is certified by independent experts said that he had no responsibility for 9/11,
that he had nothing against the American people,
that his opposition was limited to the US government’s colonial policies and control over Muslim governments.
It makes no sense that the “mastermind” of the most humiliating blow in world history ever to have been delivered against a superpower would not claim credit for his accomplishment.
BY SEPTEMBER 11, 2001, OSAMA BIN LADEN KNEW THAT HE WAS DEATHLY ILL.
According to news reports HE UNDERWENT KIDNEY DIALYSIS the following month.
The most reliable reports that we have are that HE DIED IN DECEMBER 2001.
It is simply not credible that bin Laden denied responsibility because he feared Washington.
But Osama bin Laden was too useful a bogeyman,
and Washington and the presstitute [jeu de mot pour presse/prostituée] media
KEPT HIM ALIVE FOR ANOTHER DECADE
UNTIL OBAMA NEEDED TO KILL THE DEAD MAN in order to boost his sinking standings in the polls
so that Democrats would not back a challenger for the Democratic presidential nomination.
[Son idée. Mais il se peut, étant donné que ce serait les néocons de Bush II, qui auraient organisé l’attentat, qu’un autre soit sur le point d’être organisé. Étant donné le succès du premier, de vastes possibilités s'offraient au premier qui oserait. Le coupable étant désigné d'avance, personne ne cherchera plus loin. Pourquoi pas un assassinat à la Kennedy no. 2 ? Un second (après les enveloppes à l’anthrax) avec un succès égal même s'il ne l'aurait pas visé personnellement aurait eu le même effet. Un meurtre social. Car il aurait totalement discrédité le nouveau président. Étrangement, si tous avaient supporté les multiples offensives contre la liberté des citoyens de la part de monsieur Bush, les abus de l'État sont tout à coup devenus intolérables de la part du nouveau président noir. Et si on protestera rarement contre la «sécurité» qui ne changea pas vraiment sous son règne, son idée de régime d'assurance maladie pour les pauvres étaient vus comme une atteinte insupportable contre les libertés individuelles et les payeurs de taxe. Et l’élection qui vient de se passer, mardi 6 novembre 2012, n’aurait pas vu sortir monsieur Barack Obama gagnant contre son adversaire Républicain, monsieur Mitt Romney. Et. ce dernier, n’aurait sans doute pas été là puisqu’un vrai dur de dur, un faucon comme on les aime là-bas aurait été en lice. Et puisque les cibles du jour étaient la Syrie et, ensuite, l’Iran. Les USA seraient déjà en Syrie. Scénario inenvisageable et qui a nécessité la fin de la marionnette Ben Laden qui avait assez survécu trop longtemps à son utilité. On organisa donc – puisqu’on ne peut qu’imaginer la chose- une opération de commando sur un des innombrables mafieux Pakistanais. Un petit vieux barbu comme on les aime. Qu’on descendit. Et, pour éviter toute analyse future – on vient de déterrer le corps de monsieur Arafat mardi 27 novembre 2012 (enterré le 11 nov. 2004)
http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/monde/20121126.OBS0503/yasser-arafat-5-questions-autour-d-une-exhumation.html
pour vérifier la thèse probable d’assassinat par empoisonnement. De qui? Un mot en i vient à l'esprit. On ne pouvait donc risquer qu’on fasse un test d’ADN mal à propos. Autre supposition : Le cadavre de monsieur Ben Laden était congelé depuis son décès attendant sa «découverte»? Comme on a préféré balancer sa «doublure» en mer, on présume que le scénario de la capture posait également trop de problèmes. D'où l'option de la malheureuse élimination (on aurait préféré le prendre vivant mais il a combattu ou attaqué nos agents et zut!). Diverses possibilités s'offraient. Dont le «suicide» à la Salvado Allende lors du coup d’État CIA/Pinochet au Chili 11 sept. 1973. Mais on restait pris avec le corps. Pas le bon. Ou congelé depuis 10 ans. Et la science actuelle sait reconnaître ce genre de chose. Une partie de ce scénario a été utilisée au Pakistan. On a résumé au plus simple. Plus de corps. Personne n'en parle. Et, surprise, les médias ne parlent presque plus d'Al Qaïda. On continuera à parler de «terroristes», les communistes de notre époque. Ou des Talibans. Mais où sont passés les si dangereux terroristes? Aux dernières nouvelles, les militants d'Al Qaïda seraient en Syrie à nos côtés pour combattre pour la liberté.]
[Si on veut parler de la «démocratie» US et des élections totalement absurdes car sans limitation des dépenses électorales de la part des individus. De toute façon à peu près interchangeables. Comme ici. Ceci ordonné par la Cour Suprême. Pire, les personnes «morales» (les compagnies) (le mot «moral» à côté de compagnie ou d'hommes d'affaires a quelque chose...) ont le droit de jouer. Le vrai 1 $ + 1 vote que des idéalistes proposent au Canada. 6 milliards pour toutes les élections car on vote en même temps pour tout un tas de choses. 2.6 milliards pour la présidentielle. Dont 1 milliard pour monsieur Obama. Quand on dit que l’$ achète tout et que tout se vend! Ou que l’$ est le seul Dieu des USA.]
Numerous bin Laden videos, every one pronounced a fake by experts, were released whenever it was convenient for Washington.
No one in the Western media or in the US Congress or European or UK parliaments was sufficiently intelligent to recognize that a bin Laden video always showed up on cue when Washington needed it.
“Why would the ‘mastermind’ be so accommodating for Washington?”
was the question that went through my mind every time one of the fake videos was released.
The 9/11 “investigation” that finally took place
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/pagedetails.action?browsePath=107/HRPT/%5b700%3b799%5d&granuleId=CRPT-107hrpt792&packageId=CRPT-107hrpt792
was a political one run from the White House.
One member of the commission resigned, declaring the investigation to be a farce, and both co-chairman and the legal counsel of the 9/11 Commission distanced themselves from their report with statements that the 9/11 Commission was “set up to fail,”
that resources were withheld from the commission,
that representatives of the US military lied to the commission
and that the commission considered referring the false testimony for criminal prosecution.
One would think that these revelations would cause a sensation,
but the news media,
Congress,
the White House,
and the public
were SILENT.
All of this bothered me a great deal.
The US had invaded 2 Muslim countries based on unsubstantiated allegations linking the two countries to 9/11,
which itself remained uninvestigated.
[Et on utilisa la torture pour faire dire à des Afghans que l’Irak était complice de monsieur Ben Laden]
The neoconservatives who staffed the George W. Bush regime
were advocating more invasions of more Muslim countries.
Paul O’Neill, President Bush’s first Treasury Secretary, stated publicly that
the Bush regime was planning to invade Iraq prior to 9/11.
O’Neill said that no one at a National Security Council meeting even asked the question, why invade Iraq?
“It was all about finding a way to do it.”
http://articles.cnn.com/2004-01-10/politics/oneill.bush_1_roomful-of-deaf-people-education-of-paul-o-neill-national-security-council-meeting?_s=PM:ALLPOLITICS
The leaked top secret Downing Street Memo written by the head of British intelligence (MI6) confirms Paul O’Neill’s testimony.
The memo, known as the “smoking gun memo”
whose authenticity has been confirmed, states that “President George W. Bush wants to remove Saddam Hussein, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD.
But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.”
In other words, the US invasion of Iraq was based on nothing but a made up lie.
[Et des centaines de milliers de morts Irakien!]
As an engineering student I had witnessed a controlled demolition.
When films of the collapse of WTC building 7 emerged,
it was obvious that building 7 had been brought down by controlled demolition.
When physics instructor David Chandler measured the descent of the building and established that it
TOOK PLACE AT FREE FALL ACCELERATION,
the case was closed.
BUILDINGS CANNOT ENTER FREE FALL UNLESS CONTROLLED DEMOLITION HAS REMOVED ALL RESISTANCE TO THE COLLAPSING FLOORS.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lESol88wOi0
[Il faut cisailler toutes les poutres et piliers métalliques et les dalles de béton avec un cordeau détonnant ? Ce qui n’a pu se faire que lors de la construction ce qui pose d’autres problèmes. Qui? Dans quel but?]
IF AIRLINERS BROUGHT DOWN TWO SKYSCRAPERS,
WHY WAS CONTROLLED DEMOLITION USED TO BRING DOWN A THIRD BUILDING?
I assumed that structural architects, structural engineers, and physicists would blow the whistle on the obviously false story.
If I could see that something was amiss, certainly more highly trained people would.
The first physicist to make an effective and compelling argument was Steven Jones at BYU. Brigham Young University.
Jones said that explosives brought down the twin towers.
He made a good case. For his efforts, he was pressured to resign his tenured position.
I wondered whether the federal government had threatened BYU’s research grants or whether patriotic trustees and alumni were the driving force behind Jones’ expulsion.
Regardless, the message was clear to other university based experts:
“Shut up or we’ll get you.”
[Et il a été très clair pour tous les enquêteurs et spécialistes. L’incendie du Reichstag numéro 2.]
[Aux USA, on refère plutôt à Pearl Harbor, certains pensant que c'est un coup monté ce qui n'était pas nécessaire, les USA allant entrer en guerre incessamment. Mais comme image médiatique, on n'a pas fait mieux. Ensuite, évidamment, les USA ne pouvaient plus ne plus aller en guerre. Et la population était maintenant convaincue. Et les organisateurs du 11 septembre avaient sans doute ceci à l'esprit. Pour d'autres, c'est l'incendie du Reichstag qui est un coup monté ayant parfaitement réussi.]
Steven Jones was vindicated when chemist Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen In Denmark reported unequivocally that the scientific team in which he participated found
NANO-THERMITE in the residue of the twin towers.
This sensational finding was not mentioned in the US print and TV media to my knowledge.
Several years after 9/11 architect Richard Gage formed Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth, an organization that has grown to include 1,700 experts.
THE PLANS OF THE TOWERS HAVE BEEN STUDIED. THEY WERE FORMIDABLE STRUCTURES. THEY WERE CONSTRUCTED TO WITHSTAND AIRLINER HITS AND FIRES.
There is no credible explanation of their failure except intentional demolition.
I also found disturbing the gullibility of the public, media, and Congress in the unquestioning acceptance of the official stories of the
shoe-bomber, shampoo and bottled water bomber, and underwear bomber plots
to blow up airliners in transit.
These schemes are farcical.
HOW CAN WE BELIEVE THAT AL QAEDA, CAPABLE OF PULLING OFF THE MOST FANTASTIC TERRORIST ATTACK IN HISTORY and capable of devising improvised explosive devices (IEDs) that kill and maim US troops and destroy US military VEHICLES WOULD RELY ON SOMETHING THAT HAD TO BE LIGHTED WITH A MATCH?
The shoe and underwear bombers would simply have pushed a button on their cell phones or laptops, and the liquid bomb would not have required extended time in a lavatory to be mixed (all to no effect).
NONE OF THIS MAKES ANY SENSE.
Moreover, experts disputed many of the government’s claims, which were never backed by anything but the government’s story line.
There is no independent evidence that anything was involved other than firecracker powders.
The case of the underwear bomber is especially difficult to accept. According to witnesses, the underwear bomber was not allowed on the airliner, because he had no passport. So an official appears who walks him onto the airliner bound for Detroit on Christmas day. What kind of official has the authority to override established rules, and what did the official think would happen to the passenger when he presented himself to US Customs without a passport? Any official with the power to override standard operating practices would know that it was pointless to send a passenger to a country where his entry would be rejected.
THE CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE IS THAT THESE WERE ORCHESTRATED EVENTS DESIGNED TO KEEP FEAR ALIVE,
to create new intrusive powers for a new over-arching federal policy agency,
to accustom US citizens to intrusive searches
and a police force to conducting them,
and to sell expensive porno-scanners and now more advanced devices to the Transportation Safety Administration.
[Et donnant le pretexte d’acheter pour des milliards de gadgets aux amis du régime.]
Apparently, this expensive collection of high-tech gadgetry is insufficient to protect us from terrorists,
and in August 2012 the Department of Homeland Security put in an order for
750 MILLION ROUNDS OF AMMUNITION,
ENOUGH TO SHOOT EVERY PERSON IN THE US 2.5 TIMES.
Naive and gullible Americans claim that if some part of the US government had been involved in 9/11, “someone would have talked by now.”
[L’incendie du Reichstag a eu lieu 28 février 1933 et encore à nos jours, personne n’a parlé. La version officielle étant qu’un seul homme a pu brûler un aussi grand bâtiment multipliant les foyers d’incendies à toutes les étages. Et l'Incendie a servi au même usage que le 11 septembre. Monsieur Hitler a demandé qu'on lui accorde «provisoirement» tous les pouvoirs afin qu'il assure la sécurité de la population. Et, tous les autres politiciens et tous les autres partis acceptèrent. Et le parti de monsieur Hitler qui était minoritaire pris le pouvoir légalement et ne le lâche que 12 ans plus tard lorsque monsieur Hitler se suicida.]
A comforting thought, perhaps, but nothing more.
Consider, for example, THE COVER-UP BY THE US GOVERNMENT OF THE 1967 ISRAELI ATTACK ON THE USS LIBERTY
that killed or wounded most of the crew but failed to sink the ship.
As the survivors have testified, they were ordered in a threatening way not to speak about the event.
It was twelve years later before one of the USS Liberty’s officers, James Ennes, told the story of the attack in his book, Assault on the Liberty.
I continue to wonder how the professionals at the National Institute of Standards and Technology feel about being maneuvered by the federal government into the unscientific position NIST took concerning the destruction of the WTC towers.
What will be the outcome of the doubts about the official story raised by experts?
I worry that most AMERICANS ARE TOO MENTALLY AND EMOTIONALLY WEAK
to be able to come to grips with the truth.
They are far more comfortable with the story that enemies attacked America successfully despite the massive national security state in place.
THE AMERICAN PUBLIC HAS PROVED ITSELF TO BE SO COWARDLY
that it willingly, without a peep, SACRIFICED ITS CIVIL LIBERTY and the protections of law guaranteed by the Constitution
IN ORDER TO BE “SAFE.”
Congress is not about to expose itself for having squandered
TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON POINTLESS WARS
BASED ON AN ORCHESTRATED “NEW PEARL HARBOR.”
WHEN THE NEOCONSERVATIVES SAID THAT A “NEW PEARL HARBOR” WAS A REQUIREMENT FOR THEIR WARS FOR AMERICAN/ISRAELI HEGEMONY,
they set the stage for the 21st century wars that Washington has launched.
IF SYRIA FALLS, THERE IS ONLY IRAN, AND THEN WASHINGTON STANDS IN DIRECT CONFRONTATION WITH RUSSIA AND CHINA.
[Et ce sera la Troisième Guerre Mondiale ou la première de notre ère. Se souvenir que la Première commença en 1914!]
Unless Russia and China can be overthrown with “color revolutions,”
these two nuclear powers are unlikely to submit to Washington’s hegemony.
The world as we know it might be drawing to a close.
If enough Americans or even other peoples in the world had the intelligence to
REALIZE THAT MASSIVE STEEL STRUCTURES DO NOT DISINTEGRATE INTO FINE DUST
[Et le béton aussi.]
[On a pu voir les images de reportages des destructions causées en Irak ou à Gaza. Les ruines des immeubles de béton fracturés en grosses sections. Jamais en quelque chose qui rappelle la poudre. Les seules images qui rappellent ce processus sont celles que l’on a pu voir à la TV d’immeubles implosés volontairement.]
because a flimsy airliner hits them and
LIMITED SHORT-LIVED FIRES BURN ON A FEW FLOORS,
[On nous raconte que le kérosène en flamme s’écoulant des réservoir se répandit d’étages en étages mettant le feu aux tapis et aux rideaux. Triste!]
Washington would be faced with the suspicion it deserves.
If 9/11 was actually the result of the failure of the national security state to deter an attack,
the government’s refusal to conduct a real investigation is an even greater failure.
It has fallen to concerned and qualified individuals to perform the investigative role abandoned by government.
The presentations at the Toronto Hearings, along with the evaluations of the Panel, are now available, as is the documentary film, “Explosive Evidence–Experts Speak Out,”
provided by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
The government’s agents and apologists try to deflect attention from disturbing facts by redefining factual evidence revealed by experts as the product of “a conspiracy culture.”
[Pour tous les «journalistes» ou employés des medias clônés et élevés en couveuse, les mots «conspirationnistes» ou «théorie du complot» sont devenus l’équivalent des négationnistes ou antisémites. Madame cachez ce sein que je ne saurai voir. Molière.]
If people despite their brainwashing and lack of scientific education are able to absorb the information made available to them,
perhaps both the US Constitution and peace could be restored.
Only informed people can restrain Washington
[Bonne chance!]
and avert the CRAZED HEGEMONIC US GOVERNMENT
from DESTROYING THE WORLD IN WAR.
[S’il y a une guerre mondiale tant pis!]
*
September 11, 2001. Statement by the president in his address to the nation.
http://www.opm.gov/guidance/09-11-01GWB.htm
*
JOINT INQUIRY INTO INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES BEFORE AND AFTER THE TERRORIST ATTACKS OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001
December 31, 2001
U.S. Government Printing Office
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/pagedetails.action?browsePath=107/HRPT/%5b700%3b799%5d&granuleId=CRPT-107hrpt792&packageId=CRPT-107hrpt792
*
Rebuilding america’s defenses. Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century. A Report of The Project for the New American Century September 2000
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
*
Article en français
LE ONZIÈME ANNIVERSAIRE DU 11-SEPTEMBRE
De Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
01 décembre 2012
Global Research
http://www.mondialisation.ca/le-onzieme-anniversaire-du-11-septembre/5313744
http://www.reopen911.info/News/2012/11/30/paul-craig-roberts-le-onzieme-anniversaire-du-11-septembre/
*
Et il ne faut pas oublier les attentats de Londres et Madrid. Et Toronto. Dont voici une version romancée (en cours de construction):
http://henrydickson.blogspot.ca/2012/10/286.html
HARRY DICKSON. 286.
JE SUIS UN ASSASSIN POLITIQUE
Il y a 7 ans
